geography: affect history of group of people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, culture
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.34
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect history of group of people 1.00
affect history of group 0.97
affect history 0.90
affect people 0.85
affect society 0.80
affect ones culture 0.79
affect culture of area 0.79
affect culture of region 0.79
affect micmac culture 0.79
affect culture 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(biology, affect society)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(biology, affect society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(biology, affect society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(geography, affect history of group of people)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(geography, affect history)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(geography, affect history)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(geography, affect history)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(geography, affect people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(geography, affect people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of region)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(geography, affect people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of region)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of area)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture of region)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture of area)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect history)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of region)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(geography, affect history of group of people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect culture)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, affect society)