housing: be expensive in canada

Related concepts

Parents	concern Weight: 0.63 , real estate Weight: 0.63 , department Weight: 0.61 , commodity Weight: 0.60
Siblings	condo Weight: 0.34 , condominium Weight: 0.34 , townhouse Weight: 0.33 , real estate agent Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in canada expensive	1.00
be expensive in canada	1.00
be in canada	0.95
be in australia expensive	0.90
be expensive in india	0.88
is cheaper uk	0.85
be in australia	0.84
be expensive in zealand	0.83
be expensive in ontario	0.82
be expensive in new zealand	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in canada)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in canada)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(concern, be in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(concern, be in australia)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in canada)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(concern, be in australia)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(concern, be in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(housing, be in canada expensive)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(housing, be in canada expensive)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(housing, be in canada expensive)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(housing, be in canada)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(housing, be in canada)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(housing, be in canada)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(housing, be in canada expensive)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(housing, be in canada)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in ontario)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in ontario)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in ontario)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in ontario)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(housing, be in australia)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(concern, be in australia)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(concern, be in australia)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(housing, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)