housing: be in australia expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.63
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.34
, condominium
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.33
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia expensive 1.00
be in australia 0.96
be in canada expensive 0.90
be expensive in canada 0.90
be expensive in india 0.87
be expensive in zealand 0.86
be in canada 0.85
be expensive in new zealand 0.84
is cheaper uk 0.84
is uk 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(concern, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(concern, be in australia)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(concern, be in australia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(concern, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(townhouse, is uk)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(townhouse, is uk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper uk)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(housing, be in canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(housing, be in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(housing, be in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(housing, be in australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(concern, be in australia)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(townhouse, is uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(concern, be in australia)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)