hummingbird: flap fast wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, bird
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, insect
Weight: 0.56
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37
, robin
Weight: 0.37
, heron
Weight: 0.37
, wren
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
flap fast wings 1.00
flap wings 0.97
has physical part wings 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hummingbird, flap fast wings)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hummingbird, flap wings)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap wings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hummingbird, has physical part wings)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)