hummingbird: has physical part wings

Related concepts

Parents	creature Weight: 0.68 , bird Weight: 0.67 , species Weight: 0.63 , animal Weight: 0.58 , insect Weight: 0.56
Siblings	peregrine falcon Weight: 0.38 , owl Weight: 0.37 , robin Weight: 0.37 , heron Weight: 0.37 , wren Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part wings	1.00
has physical part beaks	0.80
flap fast wings	0.79
flap wings	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(hummingbird, flap wings)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(hummingbird, flap fast wings)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap wings)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(hummingbird, has physical part beaks)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part beaks)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part beaks)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(hummingbird, has physical part beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)