hypnosis: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents modality
Weight: 0.63
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acupuncture
Weight: 0.35
, reflexology
Weight: 0.34
, chiropractic
Weight: 0.33
, acupressure
Weight: 0.33
, gene therapy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
be good for business 0.76
feel good 0.76
has quality sin 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gene therapy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gene therapy, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(reflexology, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(acupressure, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gene therapy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(reflexology, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(acupressure, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(gene therapy, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(gene therapy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(gene therapy, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(acupressure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(acupressure, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gene therapy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(gene therapy, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(reflexology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reflexology, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gene therapy, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(gene therapy, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(gene therapy, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(gene therapy, is good thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(chiropractic, feel good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(acupressure, feel good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(acupressure, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(acupuncture, feel good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, feel good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(reflexology, feel good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(reflexology, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(hypnosis, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hypnosis, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hypnosis, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hypnosis, feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(hypnosis, feel good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, feel good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(gene therapy, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chiropractic, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(acupressure, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(gene therapy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(gene therapy, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(acupuncture, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(acupressure, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(reflexology, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(gene therapy, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(reflexology, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hypnosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)