inhalation: be active process passive process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.59
, route
Weight: 0.56
, pathway
Weight: 0.53
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.49
, exposure
Weight: 0.49
Siblings spray
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.32
, enema
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be active process passive process 1.00
is passive process 0.97
be active process process 0.95
be considered active process 0.93
be described as active process 0.88
is passive 0.86
has physical part process 0.85
be considered process 0.84
is active 0.83
is chemical process 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is chemical process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(combustion, has physical part process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(combustion, is chemical process)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(combustion, is chemical process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process process)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(inhalation, is passive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is passive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(inhalation, is active)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(inhalation, is active)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is active)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is active)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(combustion, is chemical process)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(combustion, has physical part process)