inhalation: be described as process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.59
, route
Weight: 0.56
, pathway
Weight: 0.53
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.49
, exposure
Weight: 0.49
Siblings spray
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.32
, enema
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be described as process 1.00
be described as active process 0.93
be described 0.90
be considered process 0.88
be described as salt 0.82
has physical part process 0.81
be considered active process 0.80
be active process process 0.80
be described as nonlinear 0.77
be active process passive process 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(method, be described as nonlinear)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(method, be described as nonlinear)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be described as nonlinear)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(ammonium sulfate, be described)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ammonium sulfate, be described as salt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(method, be described as nonlinear)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(ammonium sulfate, be described)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(ammonium sulfate, be described)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ammonium sulfate, be described as salt)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ammonium sulfate, be described as salt)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(combustion, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as process)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(method, be described as nonlinear)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ammonium sulfate, be described)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ammonium sulfate, be described as salt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(combustion, has physical part process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(method, be described as nonlinear)