interest rate: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.70
, interest
Weight: 0.69
, rate
Weight: 0.68
, policy
Weight: 0.67
Siblings inflation
Weight: 0.61
, zero
Weight: 0.58
, capital account
Weight: 0.36
, ratio
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality bad 0.86
change over time 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(interest rate, has quality change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(interest rate, has quality change)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(interest rate, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(capital account, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(capital account, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(capital account, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(inflation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(interest rate, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, change over time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(interest rate, change over time)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(interest rate, change over time)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(interest rate, change over time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(interest rate, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inflation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inflation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(capital account, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)