lifeguard: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.54
, position
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
Siblings paramedic
Weight: 0.34
, firefighter
Weight: 0.34
, fireman
Weight: 0.33
, beach
Weight: 0.33
, swimming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
is paid little 0.90
get paid little 0.88
be paid wage 0.83
be paid minimum wage 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fireman, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(firefighter, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(firefighter, is paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fireman, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fireman, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(lifeguard, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(lifeguard, get paid)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, get paid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lifeguard, get paid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid little)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(lifeguard, is paid little)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lifeguard, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fireman, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lifeguard, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(firefighter, is paid)