lyric: have bad sites

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.70
, love song
Weight: 0.66
, song
Weight: 0.63
, content
Weight: 0.58
Siblings verse
Weight: 0.36
, f word
Weight: 0.35
, phrase
Weight: 0.35
, cunt
Weight: 0.35
, album
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad sites 1.00
have sh*t sites 0.95
have sites 0.95
is have sites 0.95
have bad websites 0.89
is have frequently sites 0.89
have terrible websites 0.85
is have dodgy sites 0.85
is have frequently dodgy sites 0.84
have websites 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(lyric, have bad sites)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(lyric, have sites)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lyric, is have sites)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lyric, have sites)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have sites)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lyric, have bad websites)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lyric, have websites)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(lyric, have bad websites)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lyric, have bad websites)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad websites)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lyric, have websites)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(lyric, have sites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lyric, is have sites)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lyric, have websites)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have sites)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sites)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have websites)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lyric, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lyric, have bad sites)