lyric: have websites

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.70
, love song
Weight: 0.66
, song
Weight: 0.63
, content
Weight: 0.58
Siblings verse
Weight: 0.36
, f word
Weight: 0.35
, phrase
Weight: 0.35
, cunt
Weight: 0.35
, album
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have websites 1.00
have bad websites 0.96
have terrible websites 0.91
have sh*t sites 0.86
have sites 0.86
is have sites 0.86
have bad sites 0.83
is have frequently sites 0.81
is have dodgy sites 0.76
is have frequently dodgy sites 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lyric, have websites)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad websites)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(lyric, have bad websites)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(lyric, have sites)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lyric, is have sites)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lyric, have bad websites)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sites)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have sites)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lyric, have sites)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have sites)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(lyric, have sites)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lyric, is have sites)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(lyric, have bad sites)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lyric, have bad websites)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lyric, have bad sites)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lyric, have bad sites)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have websites)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lyric, have websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lyric, have websites)