lyric: have terrible websites

Property	Similarity
have terrible websites	1.00
have bad websites	0.96
have websites	0.91
have bad sites	0.85
is have sites	0.80
have sh*t sites	0.80
have sites	0.80
is have dodgy sites	0.78
is have frequently dodgy sites	0.78
is have frequently sites	0.77

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(lyric, have websites)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad websites)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(lyric, have bad websites)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(lyric, have bad websites)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(lyric, have websites)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(lyric, have sites)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(lyric, is have sites)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(lyric, have bad websites)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(lyric, have sh*t sites)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(lyric, have sh*t sites)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(lyric, have sh*t sites)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(lyric, is have dodgy sites)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(lyric, have sites)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(lyric, is have dodgy sites)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have dodgy sites)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(lyric, is have sites)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sh*t sites)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(lyric, is have dodgy sites)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(lyric, have websites)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(lyric, have bad sites)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(lyric, have sites)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(lyric, have bad sites)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(lyric, have bad sites)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(lyric, is have sites)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have websites)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have sites)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sites)

Parents	word Weight: 0.70 , love song Weight: 0.66 , song Weight: 0.63 , content Weight: 0.58
Siblings	verse Weight: 0.36 , f word Weight: 0.35 , phrase Weight: 0.35 , cunt Weight: 0.35 , album Weight: 0.34

lyric: have terrible websites

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible