maryland: is best state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best state 1.00
has state state 0.80
be richest state in us 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(washington, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(washington, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(washington, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(washington, is best state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(washington, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, is best state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, is best state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, is best state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(delaware, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(delaware, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(maryland, is best state)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(maryland, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be richest state in us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(maryland, be richest state in us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(maryland, be richest state in us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(maryland, be richest state in us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(washington, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(washington, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(delaware, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(washington, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(washington, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)