massachusetts: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
is best state 0.80
is blue state 0.80
has state jobs 0.79
have governor 0.76
is commonwealth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(connecticut, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pennsylvania, is commonwealth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is commonwealth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is blue state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is blue state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is commonwealth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is blue state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(connecticut, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pennsylvania, is commonwealth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(maryland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(maryland, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(maryland, is blue state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(massachusetts, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is blue state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, have governor)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is commonwealth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is commonwealth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is commonwealth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(massachusetts, has state jobs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is commonwealth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(massachusetts, have governor)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, have governor)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(massachusetts, have governor)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is blue state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is blue state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is blue state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is commonwealth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(connecticut, is blue state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(maryland, is blue state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is commonwealth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(connecticut, is blue state)