massachusetts: is best state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best state 1.00
be best state live 0.92
be best state live in 0.92
have best education 0.82
is healthiest state 0.82
is smartest state 0.81
be best place live 0.81
has state state 0.80
have best colleges 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(new england, be best place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new england, be best place live)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be best place live)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, is best state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(maryland, has state state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(new york city, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(new york city, be best place live)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is best state)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, have best education)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is healthiest state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be best place live)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, have best colleges)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(massachusetts, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is smartest state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be best place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is healthiest state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(massachusetts, have best education)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(massachusetts, have best colleges)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be best place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is healthiest state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, have best education)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, have best colleges)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is healthiest state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best place live)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(massachusetts, have best education)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(massachusetts, have best colleges)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(new england, be best place live)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(new york city, be best place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(new england, be best place live)