maryland: was setteled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was setteled 1.00
was in year 1632 0.84
was found 0.83
was started 0.82
were setteled 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(maryland, was setteled)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(maryland, was setteled)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was found)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was started)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was started)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was started)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was found)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was found)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(maryland, was setteled)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(maryland, was setteled)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(delaware, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(delaware, was found)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(massachusetts, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was found)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new york city, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york city, was started)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(connecticut, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was started)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was found)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(maryland, was setteled)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was in year 1632)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(maryland, was in year 1632)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(maryland, were setteled)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(maryland, was in year 1632)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(maryland, were setteled)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(maryland, were setteled)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(maryland, were setteled)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(maryland, was in year 1632)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(maryland, was started)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, was started)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(maryland, was found)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(maryland, was started)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(maryland, was found)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(maryland, was found)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(maryland, was setteled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york city, was started)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(delaware, was found)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was found)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(connecticut, was started)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(connecticut, was found)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(maryland, was setteled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)