milkshake: has quality price

Related concepts

Parents	drink Weight: 0.63 , ice cream Weight: 0.61 , item Weight: 0.61 , thing Weight: 0.60 , beverage Weight: 0.54
Siblings	soda Weight: 0.36 , chocolate milk Weight: 0.36 , carbonated beverage Weight: 0.35 , alcoholic beverage Weight: 0.35 , hot chocolate Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality price	1.00
has quality prices	0.93
has quality good	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(ice cream, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality price)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(ice cream, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality price)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality price)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(milkshake, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(milkshake, has quality prices)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(milkshake, has quality good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(milkshake, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)