mind: form think

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.62
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, force
Weight: 0.60
Siblings backgammon
Weight: 0.35
, idea
Weight: 0.33
, thing
Weight: 0.33
, dark matter
Weight: 0.33
, imagination
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
form think 1.00
be used to think 0.87
think one think at time 0.85
hold think 0.81
be used to feel good 0.80
hold one think at time 0.80
be at we do not understand 0.78
be happen without your know 0.78
has nothing to do with back 0.77
do not work well 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(backgammon, has nothing to do with back)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(imagination, be used to feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(thing, be happen without your know)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(imagination, be used to feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(imagination, be used to feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(backgammon, has nothing to do with back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(backgammon, has nothing to do with back)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(thing, be happen without your know) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(thing, be happen without your know)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mind, form think)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mind, be used to think)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(mind, be used to think)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(mind, think one think at time)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mind, think one think at time)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mind, hold think)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mind, form think)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(thing, be happen without your know)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(imagination, be used to feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, form think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(backgammon, has nothing to do with back)