monopoly: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.62
, combination
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.31
, taboo
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, dominion
Weight: 0.30
, silence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be good 0.86
is bad for 0.79
has quality evil 0.78
is good game 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(board game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(title, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(board game, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board game, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(taboo, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mafia, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality evil)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(board game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(taboo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(taboo, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(capitalism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(silence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(capitalism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mafia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mafia, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(capitalism, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(monopoly, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(monopoly, be good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monopoly, is good game)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(monopoly, is good game)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality evil)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is good game)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality evil)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality evil)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(monopoly, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(board game, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(taboo, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(silence, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(silence, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mafia, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(board game, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(monopoly, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)