murder: be in tasmania

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.69
, crime
Weight: 0.64
, felony
Weight: 0.64
, act
Weight: 0.62
, evil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honor killing
Weight: 0.69
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.63
, stabbing
Weight: 0.47
, homicide
Weight: 0.37
, rape
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in tasmania 1.00
be in tasmania hard 0.90
be in nsw 0.79
be high in africa 0.78
be high in south africa 0.77
was problem in victorian london 0.77
be in brazil high 0.76
be high in brazil 0.76
be high in alaska 0.76
be popular in india 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(act, be in nsw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crime, be high in brazil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(act, be in nsw)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in brazil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in alaska)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(act, be in nsw)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in south africa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in brazil)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in alaska)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rape, be popular in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(act, be in nsw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crime, be high in brazil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(rape, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rape, be popular in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(murder, be in tasmania)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(murder, be in tasmania hard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(act, be in nsw)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(crime, be high in south africa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in brazil)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crime, be high in alaska)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rape, be popular in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(act, be in nsw)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(crime, be high in south africa)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crime, be high in alaska)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in brazil)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(murder, be in tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london)