mutton: be more expensive than beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.64
, staple
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.46
, snapper
Weight: 0.46
, flavor
Weight: 0.45
Siblings lamb
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.36
, chicken
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35
, pork
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than beef 1.00
be preffered over beef 0.85
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(snapper, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(staple, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(staple, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(snapper, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(snapper, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(staple, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(snapper, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(staple, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mutton, be more expensive than beef)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be preffered over beef)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mutton, be preffered over beef)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mutton, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mutton, be preffered over beef)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mutton, be preffered over beef)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mutton, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mutton, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mutton, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(staple, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(snapper, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(staple, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(snapper, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mutton, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)