panel: get cheaper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
Siblings eminent domain
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.31
, topic
Weight: 0.31
, moderator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
get cheaper 1.00
be cheaper on end 0.92
is expensive 0.83
is cheap 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(panel, get cheaper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(panel, get cheaper)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(panel, get cheaper)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(panel, get cheaper)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(panel, get cheaper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(board, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(issue, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(issue, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(court case, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panel, get cheaper)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panel, get cheaper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panel, get cheaper)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panel, get cheaper)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panel, get cheaper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(court case, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(court case, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(panel, get cheaper)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is cheap)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(panel, is cheap)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(panel, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panel, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(panel, is cheap)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(panel, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(panel, get cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(board, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(court case, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(board, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(panel, get cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)