pet: dogs in particular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
dogs in particular 1.00
be like dogs 0.89
is dogs 0.89
is dog 0.85
like animals is pets 0.82
be called pets 0.80
be like dogs scared 0.79
is cats 0.79
be than cats 0.79
like animals is particularly mammals 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pet, dogs in particular)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pet, is dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pet, is dog)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(pet, like animals is pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, is dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, is cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pet, be than cats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pet, is cats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pet, is dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(pet, be than cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pet, be called pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pet, is dog)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dog)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(pet, is dog)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pet, like animals is pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, like animals is pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pet, like animals is pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pet, be than cats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pet, be called pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pet, is cats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pet, be called pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pet, be than cats)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pet, is cats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pet, dogs in particular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pet, dogs in particular) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)