php: be considered better than nodejs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.64
, programming language
Weight: 0.64
, database
Weight: 0.61
, web page
Weight: 0.60
, software
Weight: 0.58
Siblings perl
Weight: 0.37
, css
Weight: 0.36
, javascript
Weight: 0.35
, xml
Weight: 0.35
, ajax
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered better than nodejs 1.00
be better for e-commerce 0.90
be more than csgo 0.87
be faster than xpath 0.83
be considered bad 0.83
has quality better 0.80
get worse 0.80
be better than google 0.78
be better than json 0.78
is quicker 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(database, be better than google)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(software, get worse)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(software, get worse)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(database, be better than google)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(programming language, is quicker)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(software, get worse)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(database, be better than google)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(javascript, be considered bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better than json)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(css, be faster than xpath)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(css, be more than csgo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(database, be better than google)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(software, get worse)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(css, be more than csgo)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(css, be more than csgo)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(css, be faster than xpath)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(css, be faster than xpath)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(javascript, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(javascript, be considered bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(xml, be better than json)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(xml, be better than json)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(php, be considered better than nodejs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(php, be considered bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(php, be considered bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(php, be considered bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(software, get worse)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(database, be better than google)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(programming language, is quicker)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(css, be more than csgo)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(javascript, be considered bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(css, be faster than xpath)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(xml, be better than json)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(software, get worse)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(database, be better than google)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(programming language, is quicker)