database: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.61
, search engine
Weight: 0.60
Siblings world wide web
Weight: 0.64
, xml
Weight: 0.62
, php
Weight: 0.61
, collection
Weight: 0.59
, fingerprint
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be better for e-commerce 0.88
has quality system 0.84
has quality worth 0.83
be considered better than nodejs 0.80
has quality joke 0.77
is best 0.76
be good for business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(search engine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spreadsheet, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(search engine, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tool, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(search engine, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, is best)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(php, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(php, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(php, has quality joke)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(search engine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spreadsheet, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(php, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(php, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(xml, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(php, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(php, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(xml, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(php, be considered better than nodejs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(php, be considered better than nodejs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(php, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(php, has quality joke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(database, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(database, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(database, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(database, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality system)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(search engine, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(php, be considered better than nodejs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(php, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(php, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(xml, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(php, has quality joke)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(search engine, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)