planning: be important in project management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in project management 1.00
be important in management 0.90
be important to resource management 0.87
is management 0.86
be important to human resource management 0.85
was important to development 0.83
was management change 0.82
projects 0.80
be important process for managers 0.80
is management function 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important in project management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human resource management)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marketing, was management change)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(approach, projects)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marketing, is management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in project management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(marketing, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marketing, is management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(approach, projects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(approach, projects)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(development, be important to human resource management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important to human resource management)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(marketing, was management change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(marketing, was management change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(planning, be important in project management)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(planning, is management)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(planning, is management)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(planning, is management)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(planning, is management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(planning, is management function)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, is management function)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(planning, is management function)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(planning, be important process for managers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(planning, is management function)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(planning, be important process for managers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(planning, be important process for managers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important in project management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marketing, is management)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(approach, projects)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(marketing, was management change)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important to human resource management)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)