planning: be important process for managers

Related concepts

Parents	strategy Weight: 0.69 , stage Weight: 0.64 , step Weight: 0.62 , preparation Weight: 0.62
Siblings	marketing Weight: 0.34 , plan Weight: 0.34 , social engineering Weight: 0.33 , development Weight: 0.32 , approach Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important process for managers	1.00
be for managers	0.92
be as function of managers	0.88
be as pervasive function of managers	0.83
be important in management	0.83
be important in project management	0.80
is is process	0.80
be important for employees	0.80
be important to resource management	0.78
has physical part process	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(planning, be important process for managers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(marketing, has physical part process)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(development, be important for employees)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(development, has physical part process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(planning, be important process for managers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(development, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(development, has physical part process)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(development, be important for employees) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(development, be important for employees)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(marketing, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(marketing, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(planning, be important process for managers)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(planning, be for managers)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(planning, be for managers)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(planning, be for managers)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(planning, be as function of managers)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(planning, is is process)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(planning, be for managers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(planning, be as function of managers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(planning, has physical part process)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(planning, is is process)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(planning, be as function of managers)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(planning, is is process)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(planning, has physical part process)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(planning, has physical part process)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function of managers)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(planning, is is process)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(planning, be important in project management)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(planning, has physical part process)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(planning, be important in project management)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(planning, be important in project management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(planning, be important process for managers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(development, has physical part process)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(marketing, has physical part process)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(development, be important for employees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(planning, be important process for managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)