poverty: be in africa effect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in africa effect 1.00
be in sub-saharan africa 0.91
be in africa 0.91
be problem in africa 0.88
be high in africa 0.87
be in places like africa 0.86
be problem in south africa 0.86
be high in south africa 0.85
be in zimbabwe 0.80
happen in zimbabwe 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa effect)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in south africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(poverty, be in africa effect)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(poverty, be high in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(poverty, be in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa effect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(crime, be high in south africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(unemployment, be problem in south africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(poverty, be in africa effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(crime, be high in south africa)