presentation: be important in food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performance
Weight: 0.64
, slide
Weight: 0.61
, website
Weight: 0.61
, detail
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lecture
Weight: 0.69
, speaker
Weight: 0.62
, concert
Weight: 0.61
, national convention
Weight: 0.57
, web page
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in food 1.00
be important in life 0.77
be important at work 0.77
be very important in education 0.76
be important in education 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(performance, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(performance, be important in education)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in life)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(performance, be important in education)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(performance, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in food)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(presentation, be important at work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in life)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(presentation, be very important in education)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in education)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important at work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in life)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in education)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(presentation, be very important in education)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(presentation, be important at work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in life)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in education)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(presentation, be very important in education)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be very important in education)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in education)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important at work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in life)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(performance, be important in education)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in life)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(presentation, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(performance, be important in education)