produce: has quality better

Related concepts

Parents	fresh food Weight: 0.60 , department Weight: 0.54 , cause Weight: 0.54 , ingredient Weight: 0.52
Siblings	raw material Weight: 0.66 , berry Weight: 0.60 , paddy Weight: 0.41 , fresh fruit Weight: 0.33 , fruit Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality better	1.00
has quality good	0.94
has quality bad	0.90
be better than food	0.82
be good for	0.79
has quality resources	0.79
be much better tasting than food	0.76
be better than fruit	0.75
be better than juice	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(fresh food, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(produce, has quality better)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(produce, has quality better)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(fresh food, be better than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(produce, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(fresh food, has quality better)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(fresh food, has quality better)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than juice)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(berry, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, has quality better)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(fresh food, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(produce, has quality better)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(fresh food, be better than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(produce, has quality better)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(produce, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(fresh fruit, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, has quality better)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(berry, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(berry, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than juice) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than juice)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(produce, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(produce, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than food)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(fresh food, has quality better)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has quality better)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than juice)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(fruit, be better than juice)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(berry, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(fresh food, has quality better)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than food)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(produce, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)