pushing: is back good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, behavior
Weight: 0.50
, movement
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings move
Weight: 0.32
, moving
Weight: 0.32
, fighting
Weight: 0.32
, step
Weight: 0.31
, cutting
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is back good 1.00
feel good 0.83
has quality good 0.79
be considered bad thing 0.76
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pushing, is back good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pushing, is back good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(movement, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(movement, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fighting, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cutting, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cutting, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(moving, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fighting, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(moving, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cutting, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fighting, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pushing, is back good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pushing, is back good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fighting, feel good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fighting, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cutting, feel good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cutting, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fighting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fighting, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cutting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cutting, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(moving, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(moving, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fighting, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fighting, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(cutting, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cutting, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(moving, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(moving, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pushing, is back good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pushing, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pushing, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pushing, be considered bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pushing, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pushing, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(pushing, be considered bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pushing, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(pushing, be considered bad thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pushing, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pushing, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pushing, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pushing, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pushing, be considered bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pushing, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pushing, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pushing, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pushing, is back good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fighting, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fighting, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fighting, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cutting, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cutting, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(moving, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cutting, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(moving, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pushing, is back good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)