recycling: produce less waste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
produce less waste 1.00
produce waste 0.96
reduce need for landfill 0.80
be more difficult recycling 0.78
be than landfill 0.77
decrease amount in landfills 0.77
be less expensive processing 0.76
be example of open-loop recycling 0.75
was called recycling 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, produce less waste)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(recycling, produce waste)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, produce waste)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(recycling, produce waste)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(recycling, was called recycling)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(recycling, be less expensive processing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recycling, be less expensive processing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recycling, be less expensive processing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be less expensive processing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(recycling, was called recycling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(recycling, was called recycling)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce waste)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, was called recycling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, produce less waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recycling, produce less waste)