red panda: have long tail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long tail 1.00
has physical part tail 0.90
have long tails 0.88
has physical part tails 0.78
have striped tails 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(monkey, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tail)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tail)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(monkey, have long tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(monkey, have long tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, have long tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(monkey, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(komodo dragon, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, have long tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(red panda, have long tail)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red panda, have striped tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(red panda, have striped tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(red panda, have striped tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have striped tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(red panda, have long tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(monkey, have long tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, have long tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(monkey, have long tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, have long tail)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)