rejection: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, emotion
Weight: 0.59
, complication
Weight: 0.59
, feeling
Weight: 0.58
Siblings denial
Weight: 0.34
, heart failure
Weight: 0.34
, renal failure
Weight: 0.33
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.33
, disappointment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
feel bad 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
hurt bad 0.77
has quality question 0.76
feel good 0.76
is good thing 0.75
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(emotion, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(feeling, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(emotion, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(emotion, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(feeling, is bad thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(feeling, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(emotion, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(emotion, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(emotion, feel good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(emotion, is good thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(feeling, is bad thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(feeling, feel good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(emotion, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(feeling, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(emotion, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(denial, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(disappointment, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(rejection, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(rejection, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rejection, feel bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(rejection, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(rejection, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rejection, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(rejection, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(rejection, feel bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(rejection, feel bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rejection, hurt bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rejection, hurt bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rejection, hurt bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rejection, hurt bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rejection, feel bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(feeling, is bad thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(feeling, feel good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(emotion, feel good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(emotion, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(denial, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(feeling, is bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(feeling, feel good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(emotion, feel good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(emotion, is good thing)