role: play technique learn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.62
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings leadership
Weight: 0.67
, snow queen
Weight: 0.59
, reconnaissance
Weight: 0.58
, tester
Weight: 0.54
, tiny tim
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
play technique learn 1.00
play teaching strategy 0.78
play effective teaching strategy 0.77
be good skill have 0.76
be in method important 0.76
is important skill 0.75
be in method 0.75
is skill 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(role, play technique learn)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(step, be in method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(role, play technique learn)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(step, be in method)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(step, be in method important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method important)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(leadership, is important skill)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(leadership, is skill)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(role, play technique learn)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(step, be in method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(role, play technique learn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(leadership, be good skill have)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(leadership, is skill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(leadership, is skill)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(leadership, is important skill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(leadership, is important skill)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(role, play technique learn)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(role, play teaching strategy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(role, play teaching strategy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(role, play teaching strategy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(role, play teaching strategy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(role, play effective teaching strategy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(role, play effective teaching strategy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(role, play effective teaching strategy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(role, play effective teaching strategy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(role, play technique learn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(step, be in method)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(step, be in method important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(leadership, is skill)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leadership, be good skill have)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(leadership, is important skill)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(step, be in method)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(role, play technique learn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(step, be in method important)