safety: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents protection
Weight: 0.63
, value
Weight: 0.62
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hazard
Weight: 0.59
, safety glass
Weight: 0.36
, health insurance
Weight: 0.33
, health
Weight: 0.33
, integrity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality right 0.90
has quality worth 0.85
is good leadership quality 0.84
has quality system 0.84
quality of life 0.82
is good value 0.81
be related quality of life important 0.80
be related quality of life 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(safety, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(protection, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(protection, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality right)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(health, be related quality of life important)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(health, quality of life)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality system)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(integrity, is good value)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(integrity, is good leadership quality)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(safety glass, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(safety, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(integrity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(integrity, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(health, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(health, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(safety glass, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(safety glass, has quality worth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(integrity, is good leadership quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(integrity, is good leadership quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(integrity, is good value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(integrity, is good value)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(health, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(health, has quality system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality right)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(health, quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(health, quality of life)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(health, be related quality of life important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(health, be related quality of life important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(safety, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(safety, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(integrity, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(safety glass, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(integrity, is good leadership quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(integrity, is good value)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(health, has quality system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(health, quality of life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality right)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(health, be related quality of life important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(safety, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)