safety: has state first

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents protection
Weight: 0.63
, value
Weight: 0.62
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hazard
Weight: 0.59
, safety glass
Weight: 0.36
, health insurance
Weight: 0.33
, health
Weight: 0.33
, integrity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state first 1.00
has state third 0.92
has state need 0.82
be by state 0.81
has state needs 0.78
has state problem 0.77
be important in first aid 0.76
has state dark 0.76
has state care 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(topic, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(safety, has state first)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(topic, has state dark)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(topic, has state dark)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(health, has state care)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(topic, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(safety, has state first)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(health, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(health, has state care)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hazard, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(safety, has state first)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(safety, has state need)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(safety, has state third)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(safety, has state third)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(safety, has state third)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state third)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(safety, has state needs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(safety, has state need)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(safety, has state needs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(safety, be important in first aid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(safety, has state need)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(safety, has state needs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(safety, be important in first aid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(safety, be important in first aid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(safety, be important in first aid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state needs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(safety, has state first)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(topic, has state dark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(health, has state care)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(safety, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(topic, has state dark)