safety: has state need

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents protection
Weight: 0.63
, value
Weight: 0.62
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hazard
Weight: 0.59
, safety glass
Weight: 0.36
, health insurance
Weight: 0.33
, health
Weight: 0.33
, integrity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state need 1.00
has state needs 0.92
has state problem 0.84
has state care 0.83
has state first 0.82
be by state 0.81
is needed 0.81
need wanted 0.79
has state concern 0.79
have needed laws 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(feature, need wanted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(safety, has state need)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(feature, need wanted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(feature, need wanted)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state concern)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(health, has state care)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(health, have needed laws)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(feature, need wanted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(safety, has state need)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(hazard, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hazard, has state concern)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(health, have needed laws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(health, have needed laws)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(health, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(health, has state care)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hazard, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(safety, has state need)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state needs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state first)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(safety, is needed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(safety, is needed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(safety, have needed laws)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(safety, have needed laws)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(safety, has state needs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(safety, is needed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(safety, has state needs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(safety, has state needs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(safety, has state first)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(safety, is needed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(safety, have needed laws)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(safety, have needed laws)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(safety, has state first)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(safety, has state first)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(safety, has state need)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, need wanted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hazard, has state concern)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(health, have needed laws)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(health, has state care)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(safety, has state need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, need wanted)