samsung: be cheaper than iphone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than iphone 1.00
be more expensive than iphone 0.96
be better than iphone 0.95
produce parts for iphone 0.87
be cheaper than apple 0.86
is s8 dual sim cheaper 0.81
be cheaper dual sim 0.81
be more expensive in korea 0.79
stop paid apps in april 0.77
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nokia, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(iphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iphone, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(nokia, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nokia, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, stop paid apps in april)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(samsung, produce parts for iphone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive in korea)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(samsung, produce parts for iphone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(samsung, stop paid apps in april)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(samsung, be more expensive in korea)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(samsung, stop paid apps in april)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper dual sim)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(samsung, is s8 dual sim cheaper)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(samsung, stop paid apps in april)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper dual sim)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(samsung, be more expensive in korea)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is s8 dual sim cheaper)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(samsung, be more expensive in korea)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(samsung, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(samsung, produce parts for iphone)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(samsung, produce parts for iphone)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper dual sim)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(samsung, is s8 dual sim cheaper)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper dual sim)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(samsung, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(samsung, is s8 dual sim cheaper)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(samsung, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(client, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nokia, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iphone, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(client, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)