sector: be more effective than sector

Related concepts

Parents	segment Weight: 0.62 , issue Weight: 0.55 , factor Weight: 0.54 , unit Weight: 0.54
Siblings	automobile industry Weight: 0.76 , financial institution Weight: 0.72 , oil company Weight: 0.72 , public transport Weight: 0.71 , industry Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more effective than sector	1.00
be more effective than public sector	0.97
be called sector	0.87
be dependent on sector	0.84
be dependent on primary sector	0.83
be called agricultural sector	0.80
be better than private transport	0.79
be better than public	0.79
is more important	0.78
affect market for music industries	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(issue, affect market for music industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than private transport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(public transport, be better than private transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than private transport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(sector, be more effective than sector)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(sector, be called sector)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(sector, be called sector)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(sector, be called sector)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(sector, be dependent on sector)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(sector, be dependent on sector)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(sector, be dependent on primary sector)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(sector, be called sector)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(sector, be called agricultural sector)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(sector, be dependent on primary sector)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(sector, be better than public)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(sector, be dependent on sector)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(sector, is more important)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(sector, be dependent on sector)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(sector, be dependent on primary sector)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(sector, be dependent on primary sector)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(sector, is more important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(public transport, be better than private transport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)