segregation: was good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.61
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings slavery
Weight: 0.34
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, apartheid
Weight: 0.34
, bigotry
Weight: 0.34
, assimilation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good 1.00
has quality good 0.84
is bad thing 0.81
has quality bad 0.81
was when 0.79
was started 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(segregation, was good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(segregation, was good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(segregation, was good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(slavery, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was started)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was started)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(slavery, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(slavery, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(segregation, was good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(segregation, was good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(segregation, was good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(slavery, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(slavery, was good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(slavery, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(slavery, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(slavery, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(slavery, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(assimilation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assimilation, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(slavery, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(slavery, was started)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(apartheid, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(apartheid, was started)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(slavery, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(slavery, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(segregation, was good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(segregation, was when)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(segregation, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(segregation, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(segregation, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(segregation, was started)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(segregation, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(segregation, was started)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(segregation, was when)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(segregation, was started)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(segregation, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was started)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(segregation, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(segregation, was when)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(segregation, is bad thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(segregation, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(segregation, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(segregation, is bad thing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(segregation, is bad thing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(segregation, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was when)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(segregation, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(slavery, was good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(slavery, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(slavery, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(assimilation, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(apartheid, was started)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(slavery, was started)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(slavery, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(segregation, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)