septic tank: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tank
Weight: 0.80
, plumbing
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.62
, facility
Weight: 0.61
Siblings gas tank
Weight: 0.38
, water heater
Weight: 0.36
, toilet tank
Weight: 0.34
, gallon
Weight: 0.34
, sprinkler
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
has quality full 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
be good at lvl45 0.77
is terrible 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(septic tank, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(septic tank, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tank, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(septic tank, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tank, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(septic tank, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tank, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tank, has quality full)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tank, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tank, has quality full)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sprinkler, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tank, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tank, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sprinkler, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sprinkler, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(water heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, is quality)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(septic tank, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(septic tank, has quality full)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality full)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(septic tank, has quality full)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(septic tank, has quality full)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(septic tank, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(septic tank, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tank, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tank, has quality full)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sprinkler, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water heater, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tank, be bad for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(septic tank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tank, has quality full)