skink: has physical part legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lizard
Weight: 0.55
, reptile
Weight: 0.47
, name
Weight: 0.45
, animal
Weight: 0.44
, amphibian
Weight: 0.33
Siblings iguana
Weight: 0.34
, toad
Weight: 0.34
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.34
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.34
, frog
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part legs 1.00
has physical part tails 0.85
has physical part tongue 0.81
has physical part tongues 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part legs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part legs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part legs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(frog, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part legs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part legs)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part legs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)