sleep: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
, rhythm
Weight: 0.59
, comfort
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sleep deprivation
Weight: 0.37
, sleeping
Weight: 0.34
, insomnia
Weight: 0.34
, couch
Weight: 0.33
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
get better 0.85
be better than day 0.82
has quality difference 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rhythm, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rhythm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(rhythm, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rhythm, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rhythm, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhythm, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, get better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be better than day)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(insomnia, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(couch, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sleep deprivation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rhythm, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rhythm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sleep deprivation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sleep deprivation, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(couch, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(couch, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sleeping, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(insomnia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(insomnia, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(sleeping, get better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sleeping, get better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sleeping, be better than day)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be better than day)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sleep, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(sleep, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sleep, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rhythm, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rhythm, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sleep deprivation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(couch, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sleeping, get better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(insomnia, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sleeping, be better than day)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rhythm, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rhythm, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(sleep, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)