sloth: be at it natural habitat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at it natural habitat 1.00
be at it habitat 0.96
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.80
be at forest or zoo 0.79
be a part of ecology 0.79
be at ecology 0.78
be at tree in rainforest 0.77
be natural and cute 0.77
be at rainforest 0.77
be so natural and cute 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(animal, be natural and cute) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(animal, be at ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(animal, be a part of ecology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(animal, be at ecology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(animal, be natural and cute)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at ecology)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animal, be a part of ecology)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(animal, be natural and cute)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(animal, be at ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(animal, be natural and cute) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sloth, be at it natural habitat)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sloth, be at forest or zoo)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest or zoo)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest or zoo)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest or zoo)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(animal, be natural and cute)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(animal, be at ecology)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(animal, be a part of ecology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(animal, be natural and cute)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(animal, be at ecology)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(animal, be a part of ecology)