sloth: be at it habitat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at it habitat 1.00
be at it natural habitat 0.96
be at forest or zoo 0.79
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.78
be a part of ecosystem 0.78
be a part of ecology 0.78
be at ecology 0.77
be at tree in rainforest 0.77
be at rainforest 0.77
be at forest 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(animal, be at ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it habitat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(animal, be a part of ecology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(animal, be at ecology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(animal, be a part of ecosystem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at ecology)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animal, be a part of ecology)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(animal, be a part of ecosystem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(animal, be at ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sloth, be at it habitat)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sloth, be at it natural habitat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at it natural habitat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it natural habitat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it natural habitat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sloth, be at forest or zoo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, be at forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest or zoo)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest or zoo)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest or zoo)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at it habitat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(animal, be a part of ecosystem)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(animal, be at ecology)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(animal, be a part of ecology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(animal, be a part of ecosystem)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(animal, be at ecology)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at it habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(animal, be a part of ecology)