sloth: be at tropical rainforest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tropical rainforest 1.00
be at rainforest 0.95
be at tropical forest 0.94
be at tropical jungle 0.92
be at tree in rainforest 0.92
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.90
be at tropical rain forest 0.90
be at tropical area 0.89
be at rainforest of south america 0.86
be at amazon rainforest 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at tropical area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(lizard, be at tropical area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at tropical area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rainforest of south america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lizard, be at tropical area)