sloth: be at tropical rain forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tropical rain forest 1.00
be at tropical forest 0.95
be at rain forest 0.94
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.90
be at tropical rainforest 0.90
be at tropical area 0.89
be at tropical jungle 0.87
be at in forest 0.84
be at rain forrest 0.84
be at forest 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at tropical area)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(lizard, be at tropical area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at tropical area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rain forrest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, be at forest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forrest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lizard, be at tropical area)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rain forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)