sloth: be at rain forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rain forest 1.00
be at tropical rain forest 0.94
be at forest 0.88
be at in forest 0.88
be at rain forrest 0.87
be find in forest 0.85
sense rain 0.85
be at tropical forest 0.84
be at forest canopy 0.82
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rain forest)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at rain forrest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forrest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sloth, be at rain forrest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical rain forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, be at forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at forest canopy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forrest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sloth, be at forest canopy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at rain forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rain forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(sloth, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)